Git Integration for Jira (GIJ) Feedback

The create branch / pull request dialog, limits the repository drop-down to ten elements. This is to maximize performance. When a user search for a repository, sometimes, the names are related to organizations/groups and this makes difficult to identify the specific repository. Allow users to specify the number of listed repositories in the search box.

We have a request from some developers working in Gitlab self-hosted, regarding smart commits. Where they have the possibility to include multiple Jira tickets in the same commit. The default way that commit message then gets linked to one or multiple Jira tickets. Our feature request is that on a specific repository in the Gitkraken "manage repositories" as an advanced option to include a "regex" and/or a settings to only fetch the first valid Jira ticket. An example of a commit: Did a change solving "TEST-123" this is also to be worked on in ticket "ABC-123". What we would then mean is that, Gitkraken would only link the commit to "TEST-123" and ignore the last Jira ticket number "ABC-123". So basically a way to "aim" the Smart Commit to one Jira-ticket even if it has multiple Jira-ticket-references.

We have a request from some developers working in Gitlab self-hosted, for some repositories there is a need to ignore linking the commits towards a Jira ticket. For Gitkraken to only fetch the information from a repository when there is a merge-request. Our feature request is that on a specific repository in the Gitkraken "manage repositories" as an advanced option to include a setting to only fetch the the commit that's part of a merge request. An example would be that a developer is doing many commits related to a Jira ticket "TEST-123" but its first when he/she do a merge-request commit that its gets linked to the "TEST-123" ticket. It would mean that only the merge request commit would be highlighted in the Jira ticket. Not the before non merge-request commits.

we are using now jira cloud with git plugin. On our server jira was no group for each repository, so we don't care to split our project in different parts at Bitbucket. But now we see every part as separate repository and every repository as a group in git commit view. That's why we want to add the possability to "not group" by repository.

Similar to the Branch name template, provide an option to modify the description message used for when the pull requests are created with the Git Integration for Jira add-on.

Often times, users need to know the name of the integration for specific repositories. Create a toggle option to allow integration name display as a column in the repository browser.

Sometimes we reference other related tickets in the commit message, but they are being transitioned based on the PR status and we don't want that because the tickets addressed are always in the title (this is enforced by a GitHub CI action check).

Recently, it gives a wrong response to me. Espacially, when I want to create new branch and pr, extension doesn't fetch new changes from master branch or it doesn't find target branch when I want a create new pr.

When creating a connection to Gitlab, the "Display name" (otherwise available in the API as optional) is not available in the form, and is automatically set to the gitlab URL. If multiple connections (e.g. to different groups in the same Gitlab instance) are created they all appear with the same display name. Once created, it is possible to edit the display name, but then the target URL is not visible anymore anywhere, not even as a readonly field. Is it possible to add the possibility to set the display name up-front in the « Connection to gitlab » form, and to add a display of the URL in the edition form?

Currently, the plugin only supports Classic Release pipelines. While these are great for most use cases, some customers do use the power of yaml pipelines were they can define multiple stages and steps.